FORUM, Forum Discussion, Forum Gratuit, Nom de domaine, Nom de domaine gratuit, Redirection gratuite,

Forum The Liberal Democratic Party of the United States Administrators :www.dmocrats.org
Forum The Liberal Democratic Party of the United States
Not logged | Login
Online:There are 10 online. Click here to see more
Register Register | Profile Profile | Private messages Private messages | Search Search | Online Online | Help Help | Create a free blog

forum Forum index forumForum for progressives. forumPetraeus's spokeman, a juvenile wingnut, is unfit for his job

Author : Topic: Petraeus's spokeman, a juvenile wingnut, is unfit for his job  Bottom
 Pete
 Posts : 11
  Posted 30/10/2007 04:14:01 PM
Send a private message to Pete
A revealing story the corporate media doesn't want to report...

"'Gen. Petraeus' Spokesman Denies Sending Angry Email -- Plot Thickens

By Greg Mitchell

Published: October 29, 2007 8:55 PM ET updated 12:05 AM Tuesday

NEW YORK A disturbing email allegedly sent by a top U.S. military spokesman to a leading blogger at Salon.com this past weekend is just starting to draw mainstream attention. Howard Kurtz at The Washington Post mentioned it today, for example. It requires a good deal of background information to fully appreciate it, so I will provide a link to Glenn Greenwald’s blog page at Salon' (...)

The long and short of the Greenwald postings: For months the popular blogger -- a former attorney and author of the recent bestseller "A Tragic Legacy" -- has criticized the growing “politicization” of the military attached to Iraq, starting earlier this year and peaking around the appearance of Gen. David Petraeus before Congress (and the media) in September." (...)

"In the past, Greenwald had received, and printed, emails from Boylan, a public affairs officer and chief spokesman for Gen. Petraeus, denying this trend and/or defending the general. So when he received an angry email from Boylan yesterday, he posted much of it on his blog (and linked to the entire message), while asserting that the views and language in it proved his point about “politicization.”

Then it got really interesting. Boylan in another note to Greenwald seemed to deny that he wrote the email, while denouncing Greenwald for publishing it. But he did not state this clearly and refused to respond to Greenwald’s subsequent request for clarity. Meanwhile, various purported computer experts compared past and present emails from Boylan to Greenwald and suggested (to the latter) that they did seem to come from the same military email address. But no one was certain and, at the least, it raised troubling questions about someone "hijacking" the email account of Gen. Petraeus's chief spokesman (...)"
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003664994

From Greenwald's own blog today:

"Monday October 29, 2007 14:27 EST
Follow-up on the Col. Steven Boylan e-mail exchange
(updated below - Update II)
Howard Kurtz -- who dives head-first into every hysterical controversy manufactured by our nation's right-wing war cheerleaders -- was asked during his Washington Post chat today about the various emails I received from Col. Boylan yesterday (as well as objections raised to my having published the prior emails Boylan and I exchanged), and Kurtz replied (h/t Thomas C):

It's a very strange tale. I'm not sure what to make of it. I think Boylan's complaint had more to do with the publication of what he contends is a fake e-mail sent by someone else. These days, government officials know that if they send an e-mail to a reporter or commentator it's going to be used, unless specifically marked as an off-the-record communication.
Why isn't Kurtz "sure what to make of it," and why doesn't he do some work and find out? Ultimately, this "strange tale" -- which is a significant story regardless of what actually happened -- is not complicated (...)"
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/

Boylan styles himself as a supposed tough-guy military 'superpatriot' in his dealings with journalists who presume not to parrot the Bush administration line. But how 'patriotic' is it to suck up to a notorious neocon-sponsored criminal who fed phony intel to US government agencies in order to start a war in Iraq that he could gain wealth and power from -- and threatens to do more mischief in his important new role under the occupation?

"Chalabi back in action in Iraq
By Nancy A. Youssef | McClatchy Newspapers
October 28, 2007

BAGHDAD — Ahmad Chalabi, the controversial, ubiquitous Iraqi politician and one-time Bush administration favorite, has re-emerged as a central figure in the latest U.S. strategy for Iraq." (...)

"Chalabi, in the run-up to the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003, provided White House and Pentagon officials and journalists with a stream of bogus or exaggerated intelligence about Iraq's weapons programs and ties to terrorism. He also suggested that he'd lead Iraq to make peace with Israel and welcome permanent U.S. military bases, which could apply pressure to Iran and Syria." (...)



"The key is going to be getting the concerned local citizens — and all the citizens — feeling that this government is reconnected with them," Gen. David Petraeus, the top military commander here, said Saturday. Chalabi "agrees with that."


Earlier this month, Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki named Chalabi as head of the services committee, a consortium of eight service ministries and two Baghdad municipal posts, that is tasked with bringing services to Baghdad, the heart of the surge plan.
Chalabi "is an important part of the process," said Col. Steven Boylan, Petraeus' spokesman. "He has a lot of energy."
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/20893.html


forum Forum index forumForum for progressives. forumPetraeus's spokeman, a juvenile wingnut, is unfit for his job
top
Go to :
  Add a quick reply

Add a quick reply